Two Years Post-Snowden: ACLU vs Clapper

On May 7th, after a near two year ordeal, the ACLU successfully won their case against James Clapper, the head of the National Security Agency. The second circuit court ruled that section 215 of the patriot act, concerning bulk telephone record collections, was abused by the US government by interpreting the term ‘relevant’ as literally every phone record in the United States.

James Clapper, Source: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

James Clapper, Source: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters

This means any further reauthorizations of the Patriot Act will now have to include new wording to justify broader powers, something only congress can do, or the Supreme Court will have to throw the ruling out. Given the political climate right now (and the absurdity of SCOTUS disagreeing), it seems that the current ruling of ACLU vs Clapper will hold.

Little and non-existent, progress by civil liberties advocates deserves celebration. This court ruling marks a significant turn in the tide against government surveillance, and gives optimism that change may feasibly be possible on some tangible and meaningful level. I, however, remain in the camp of pessimists, because it seems for every step forward made, the government takes another 10 backwards.

Just recently, the House of Representatives passed the Orwellian ‘USA Freedom Act’, which proponents claim will curtail NSA surveillance. However, the biggest advocates of civil liberties in the house, like Justin Amash(R-MI), opposed the bill because it provides the institutional framework necessary for the surveillance the ACLU vs Clapper ruling stopped. The bill was debated for less than an hour on the floor and no amendments were allowed. Furthermore, the bill ignores several other techniques and tools used by the intelligence community to spy on citizens world wide.

UNITED STATES Ð MAY 10: Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., listens during the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on

UNITED STATES MAY 10: Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., listens during the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on “The Future of Capital Formation” on Tuesday, May 10, 2011, at the US Capitol. (Photo By Bill Clark/Roll Call)

As the bill moves to the Senate, presidential hopeful Rand Paul vows to filibuster any attempts at extending the Patriot Act without reforming the NSA. I am not holding my breath. In a few weeks, we will be crossing the two year anniversary of Edward Snowden’s leaks and I question what progress we have to look back on.

Advertisements

About Elias Garcia

18 y.o. Male Missouri, USA I like reading history, philosophy, literature, and other things that often make people snore.
This entry was posted in Government, NSA, Privacy and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Two Years Post-Snowden: ACLU vs Clapper

  1. Pingback: Not Lacking Links | Lacking Material

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s